首页> 外文OA文献 >Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national Research Register to enable 'direct to patient' enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)
【2h】

Acceptability and perceived barriers and facilitators to creating a national Research Register to enable 'direct to patient' enrolment into research: the Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE)

机译:建立国家研究注册簿以使“直接面向患者”参与研究的可接受性,障碍以及促进者:苏格兰健康研究注册簿(SHARE)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background  Difficulties with recruitment pose a major, increasingly recognised challenge to the viability of research. We sought to explore whether a register of volunteers interested in research participation, with data linkage to electronic health records to identify suitable research participants, would prove acceptable to healthcare staff, patients and researchers. Methods We undertook a qualitative study in which a maximum variation sampling approach was adopted. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners (GP), practice managers and health service researchers in two Scottish health boards. Analysis was primarily thematic to identify a range of issues and concerns for all stakeholder groups. Results The concept of a national research register was, in general, acceptable to all stakeholder groups and was widely regarded as beneficial for research and for society. Patients, however, highlighted a number of conditions which should be met in the design of a register to expedite confidence and facilitate recruitment. They also gave their perceptions on how a register should operate and be promoted, favouring a range of media. GPs and practice managers were primarily concerned with the security and confidentiality of patient data and the impact a register may have on their workload. Researchers were supportive of the initiative seeing advantages in more rapid access to a wider pool of patients. They did raise concerns that GPs may be able to block access to personal patient data held in general practice clinical systems and that the register may not be representative of the whole population. Conclusions This work suggests that patients, healthcare staff and researchers have a favourable view of the potential benefits of a national register to identify people who are potentially eligible and willing to participate in health related research. It has highlighted a number of issues for the developers to incorporate in the design of research registers.
机译:背景招聘困难对研究的可行性提出了越来越大的挑战。我们试图探讨对研究参与感兴趣的志愿人员登记册,并通过与电子健康记录的数据链接以识别合适的研究参与者,是否被医疗保健人员,患者和研究人员所接受。方法我们进行了定性研究,其中采用了最大变异抽样方法。在两个苏格兰卫生委员会中与患者,全科医生(GP),业务经理和卫生服务研究人员进行了焦点小组和访谈。分析主要是针对所有利益相关者群体确定一系列问题和关注的主题。结果总体而言,国家研究注册的概念为所有利益相关者团体所接受,并被广泛认为对研究和社会有益。然而,患者强调了在寄存器设计中应满足的一些条件,以加快信心并促进募集。他们还对如何操作和促进注册簿发表了自己的看法,这有利于各种媒体。全科医生和执业经理主要关注患者数据的安全性和机密性以及寄存器可能对其工作量造成的影响。研究人员支持该倡议,因为该倡议看到了更快地接触更多患者的优势。他们确实担心全科医生可能会阻止访问常规临床系统中保存的个人患者数据,并且登记册可能无法代表整个人群。结论这项工作表明,患者,医护人员和研究人员对国家注册簿的潜在好处持有利看法,以识别有资格并愿意参加健康相关研究的人员。它为开发人员强调了许多要纳入研究注册簿设计的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号